3,053
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
What kind of communication style does your larp encourage? Is information about the natural way game – such as character descriptions or events that are going to interact in happen – secret for the players or can anyone read it? Is it actively facilitated that you share secrets before the game through talking, or through physical action and body languagestart? Communication style Transparency can be adjusted through the charactersmake it easier for players to help each other play and create a stronger drama, through workshops, through scenography design, or through simply telling but it will ruin any surprises for the players what you want. A physical communication style might be more thrilling, letting There are also intermediate possibilities where there are secrets for some of the players immerse more through using , but not all of their senses, but a more verbal game might be easier or where the players themselves choose what to involve new players in, as well as being more realistic in many settingsreveal.
==Representation of theme==
''Abstraction vs. realism''
How does your larp represent the reality of the setting? Is realism your goal? Or do you use abstract or even surrealistic elements to focus on the feeling and atmosphere of the setting or to highlight a particular aspect of the game? If the goal of the game is to create the atmosphere of a prison camp, you might do this in two ways: by trying to simulate an actual prison camp or by using abstract or surreal elements to create the feeling of one.
Is information about Who creates the characters? Do the organizers write them? Do the players? Or maybe they are created together during a pre-game – such as character descriptions or events that workshop? Combinations of these are going to happen – secret also possible; for example, where the organizers create the characters, but the players or can anyone read it? Is it actively facilitated that you share secrets develop them during a workshop before the game start? Transparency can larp. Player-created characters might make it easier for the players more attached to help each other play the characters and create a stronger drama, but it will ruin any surprises for relieves the players. There are also intermediate possibilities where there are secrets for organizers of some of the playerswork. On the other hand, but not all, or where the players themselves choose what organizer-created characters might make it easier to revealcreate a setting and fiction coherent with your vision. ==Character creation responsibility==
''Organizer vs. player''
Who creates the characters? Do the organizers write them? Do the players? Or maybe they are created together during a pre-game workshop? Combinations of these are also possible; for example, where the organizers create the characters, but the players develop them during a workshop before the larp. Player-created characters might make the players more attached to the characters and relieves the organizers of some of the work. On the other hand, organizer-created characters might make it easier to create a setting and fiction coherent with your vision.
What motivates Some organizers consider their job done when the larp has started; then, they leave everything in the hands of the players . Others influence the game in your game? Having something to win different ways as it goes along. Are you an active or a goal to obtainpassive game master when the game has started, during ''runtime''? Game mastering might also be it individually or collectivelyof different sorts: the discrete ones, can be an easy way to motivate like sending instructed playersinto the game, especially for beginners. This is or the competition approach. On extremely intrusive ones, like stopping the other hand, you often get more interesting stories game and stronger player experiences when instructing the players collaborate – for example, by deliberately getting their characters into trouble, i.e. [[Playing to lose|playing to lose]]do a scene again differently.
==Meta-techniques==''Collaborativity vs. competivity''
''Intrusive vsWhat motivates the players in your game? Having something to win or a goal to obtain, be it individually or collectively, can be an easy way to motivate players, especially for beginners. This is the competition approach. On the other hand, you often get more interesting stories and stronger player experiences when the players collaborate – for example, by deliberately getting their characters into trouble, i.e. [[playing to lose]]. discrete''
[[Meta-technique|Metatechniques]] are techniques for giving information to the players, but not the characters, during the game. Examples can be “inner” [[monologues]] that are played out during the larp. The players can hear these, the characters cannot, but nonetheless, they can be an aid for creating stronger drama. If metatechniques are used in a game, they might be intrusive or discrete. Examples of intrusive metatechniques are techniques that force all other players to stop while it happens, while a more discrete technique might be, for example, having access to a special room where players can go to act out scenes from the past or the future. This fader illustrates the combination of the amount of meta-techniques used and their degree of intrusiveness.
==Game master style==
''Active vs. passive''
Some organizers consider their job done when the larp has started; then, they leave everything in the hands of the players. Others influence the game in different ways as it goes along. Are you an active or a passive game master? Game mastering might also be of different sorts: the discrete ones, like sending instructed players into the game, or the extremely intrusive ones, like stopping the game and instructing the players to do a scene again differently.
There are some things in larp that are difficult to play out. Hun- ger, violence, sleep deprivation, drinking, sex and drug use might be examples. If you want to include these elements in your game, how do you do it? Do you put the pressure on the players as well as the characters by using with hardcore methods such as real alcohol, real food deprivation, and waking people at night? Do you shelter the players from the pressure on the characters by using replacements like boffer swords, fake alcohol, and telling the players to pretend to be hungry or sleep deprived? Hungry players will, of course, feel what it is like to be hungry, but their ability to role-play and enjoy other aspects of the game might be hampered.
==The cost of complexity and the restrictions of the faders==
The Mixing Desk of Larp is a work in progress==Meta-techniques== ''Intrusive vs. It’s a pedagogical tool aimed discrete'' [[Meta-technique]]s are techniques for presenting and structuring some of giving information to the players, but not the characters, during the game. Examples can be “inner” [[monologues]] that are played out during the most important design choices of larp . The players can hear these, the characters cannot, but nonetheless, they can be an aid for creating stronger drama. If meta-techniques are used in a convenient formgame, they might be intrusive or discrete. There Examples of intrusive meta-techniques are plenty of techniques that force all other faders that could players to stop while it happens, while a more discrete technique might be part , for example, having access to a special room where players can go to act out scenes from the past or the future. This fader illustrates the combination of the Mixing Desk, amount of meta-techniques used and the framework is open to extensionstheir degree of intrusiveness.* [[Meta-technique]] ==Player Pressure==
Getting to know about all of this, you might be eager to try out it all, manipulating and adjusting all the faders to your heart’s content. This might be a bad idea – and it might not even be possible. If you push all the faders on a sound equalizer all the way to the top, the only thing that happens is that the sound quality gets worse. The same thing might happen when you over-adjust the faders of the Mixing Desk of Larp. When all the faders are adjusted, you might dilute the effect of the most important parts of your larp. Think about when to adjust a fader, and when to leave in a more neutral position''Hardcore vs.pretense''
AlsoThere are some things in larp that are difficult to play out. Hunger, fader adjustment violence, sleep deprivation, drinking, sex and drug use might place restrictions on other fader choicesbe examples. Making a larp with only player created characters might force If you want to use minimalist scenographyinclude these elements in your game, simply because how do you do it? Do you have no idea what put the pressure on the players as well as the characters by using with hardcore methods such as real alcohol, real food deprivation, and waking people at night? Do you shelter the players will create. Pushing from the pressure on the metatechniques-fader all characters by using replacements like boffer swords, fake alcohol, and telling the way players to intrusive might make it impossible pretend to have a goal be hungry or sleep deprived? Hungry players will, of 360-degree illusioncourse, since the metatechniques will breach the illusionfeel what it is like to be hungry, but their ability to role-play and so forthenjoy other aspects of the game might be hampered.
==Open framework=Framework=
==Video presentation=Presentation=
Fixed capitalization.
[[File:Mixing_desk_of_larpMixing desk of larp.png|right|thumb|The Mixing Desk of Larp version 24, revised after revised after [[The Larpwriter Summer School]] [[20122014]]]]'''''The Mixing Desk of Larp''' is a framework for organizing your thoughts about larp design. Look at it as a pedagogical tool more than a theory of larp design– it is an aid in visualizing the most important design choices a larpwright makes.''
When you design a larp, there are plenty of parameters you can adjust. These parameters will obviously have impact on the larp you're designing. The main idea of the Mixing Desk of Larp is that being a larpwright or larp organizer is like being a technician controlling the lights or the sound of a concert or theatre performance. At his disposal, the technician has an array of faders, increasing or decreasing the amount of lights of different colors, the volume of specific sound frequencies or similar. All these faders can be adjusted up or down, adjusting the amount of whatever they're controlling and affecting the performance.
In the same way, a larp designer can adjust the faders of the Mixing Desk of Larp, changing the larp they’re designing. You can increase the level of transparency, add a pinch of metatechniquesmeta-techniques, change the responsibility for the character creation process or introduce abstract elements to enhance a special atmosphere in the larp. All these adjustments will have effects on the game you’re organizing, and adjusting these faders can help you reach your design goal for the larp.
The goal of the Mixing Desk of Larp is to provide a framework for organizing thought about how the changes in these parameters will affect a larp, and what position of the faders are suitable for what larp. An important goal is also to recognize that there are “default positions” for these faders that will influence your larp, even if you don’t make any specific choices about them. These default positions can differ depending on larp group, community or traditions. Being aware of ones own default positions is an important goal of the Mixing Desk framework.
The first iteration of The Mixing Desk of Larp was created for [[The Larpwriter Summer School]] 2012. It was made by a crew of the summer school with many coming from [[Fantasiforbundet]], Education center POST and [[LajvVerkstaden]].
For the [[Knutepunkt -books]] for [[Knutepunkt 2013]] the article '''The Mixing Desk of Larp''' was written by [[Martin Nielsen]] and [[Martin Eckhoff Andresen]] was written with updated names and descriptions.
=The fadersFaders=
Of course, there are endless numbers of faders that could possibly have been adjusted on the Mixing Desk of Larp. Here are some of the most important parameters that can be adjusted when making a larp. The ambition is that other larpwriters will add their own faders and remove the ones they don’t find fruitful when using this framework.
==Communication styleOpenness==
''Physical Transparency vs. verbalsecrecy''
==Scenography==
''360-degree illusion vs. modelingminimalism''
How does your larp look? Do you aim for a 360° illusion[[360º]], where everything the players see around them is part of the larp? Or do you use a minimalist approach, where you only pay attention to the objects that have a function in the game? Do you accept that an object represents something else than what it really is?* [[360º]]
==OpennessCharacter Creation Responsibility==
''Transparency Organizer vs. secrecyplayer''
==Story engineRuntime Game Mastering==
''Competitive Active vs. collaborativepassive''
==Story Engine==
==Loyalty to settingSetting==
''Playability vs. plausibility''
Larpwrights often have to consider the tradeoff between playability and plausibility. When making a historical game, for example, having a female factory owner might be highly implausible. However, it might be very playable – creating lots of interesting drama and intrigues for the players to use in the larp. In most games, you leave out the characters that have nothing to contribute to the drama, even though it would be plausible to have them there. Sometimes, you make unlikely twists to make the outcome of a story unpredictable. How true will you be to your setting? A plausible story might be a requirement for players to believe and immerse into the fiction. But, the players also need drama and often the least plausible setups create the most drama.
==Bleed-in==
''Designing close Close to home vs. differentiation''
Do you use elements from the players’ real lives in the game (close to home), or do you deliberately try to create a barrier or distance (differentiation) between the character and player? Using the players’ own experiences or background might create a stronger emotional experience, but also has its downsides: making the game less larp and more reality. It can divert focus from the story and the emotions the story creates to the emotions the players bring with them into the game. Taken to the extreme, you might have the players play themselves, just in an alternative setting. Are you willing to lessen the player-character divide?
==Player pressureCommunication Style==
''Pressure on players (hardcore) Physical vs. pressure on characters (pretense)verbal'' What kind of communication style does your larp encourage? Is the natural way to interact in the game through talking, or through physical action and body language? Communication style can be adjusted through the characters, through workshops, through scenography design, or through simply telling the players what you want. A physical communication style might be more thrilling, letting the players immerse more through using all of their senses, but a more verbal game might be easier to involve new players in, as well as being more realistic in many settings.
==Player freedomRepresentation of Theme==
''Sandbox Abstraction vs. railroadingsimulation''
How much freedom does your larp represent the players have in reality of the setting? Is realism your larpgoal? Are they free Or do you use abstract or even surrealistic elements to do as they want once focus on the feeling and atmosphere of the setting or to highlight a particular aspect of the game? If the goal of the game has startedis to create the atmosphere of a prison camp, or you might do you control their possible actions through game master involvement, strict character possibilities, destinies this in two ways: by trying to simulate an actual prison camp or pre-decided endings by using abstract or events? Do you present them with a railroad or a sandbox?surreal elements to create the feeling of one.
The Mixing Desk of Larp is a work in progress. It’s a pedagogical tool aimed for presenting and structuring some of the most important design choices of larp in a convenient form. There are plenty of other faders that could be part of the Mixing Desk, and the framework is open to extensions.
Some possible faders that have been discussed, for example in the Knutepunkt 2013 book article is
* Representation of time (Chronology)
* Player freedom (Sand box vs. railroading)
* Random elements
* Degree of pervasiveness
Video presentation about the Mixing Desk of larp with [[Martin Eckhoff Andresen]] from [[Nordic Larp Talks]] [[2013]].
{{#ev:youtube|fprp4bPTbaw}}
=Source=
* [http://larpschool.blogspot.no/p/programme.html Programme for Larpwriter Summer School 2012] =External links=[http://larpschool.blogspot.no/p/resources.html Filmed fader-talks from the Larpwriter Summer School 2012]
=External Links=* [http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkcfpOLbv_dr2SI2iZk6Dnz9v30oLeCaU Filmed fader-talks from the Larpwriter Summer School 2013]* [http://larpschool.blogspot.no/p/resources.html Filmed fader-talks from the Larpwriter Summer School 2012]* [http://nordiclarp.org/mixing_desk_of_larp.psd Photoshop File for editing your own Mixing Desk]* [https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24803335/The%20Mixing%20Desk%20of%20Larp.pdf The article about the Mixing Desk from the 2013 Knutepunkt-book]
[[categoryCategory:Concepts|Mixing Desk of Larp, The]]
