Difference between revisions of "Talk:High Resolution Larp/Archive 1"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Flow talk page manager moved page Talk:High Resolution Larp to Talk:High Resolution Larp/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Conversion of wikitext talk to Structured Discussions from Talk:High Resolution Larp) |
(Wikitext talk to Structured Discussions conversion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{Archive for converted wikitext talk page|from=Talk:High Resolution Larp|date=2019-01-11}} | ||
| + | |||
I think the term High resolution larp is brilliant and very well described in Playground words. But I think the Nordic Larp Talk focus a lot on how to use Ars Ordo or Ars Amandi to avoid breaking the high resolution illusion in situations of sex or violence, rather than introducing the term. Can this be specified somehow? [[Martin Nielsen]] 25.03.2014. | I think the term High resolution larp is brilliant and very well described in Playground words. But I think the Nordic Larp Talk focus a lot on how to use Ars Ordo or Ars Amandi to avoid breaking the high resolution illusion in situations of sex or violence, rather than introducing the term. Can this be specified somehow? [[Martin Nielsen]] 25.03.2014. | ||
Maybe just adding that next to the video? --[[User:Petterkarlsson|Petterkarlsson]] ([[User talk:Petterkarlsson|talk]]) 14:33, 27 March 2014 (CET) | Maybe just adding that next to the video? --[[User:Petterkarlsson|Petterkarlsson]] ([[User talk:Petterkarlsson|talk]]) 14:33, 27 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 11 January 2019
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.
I think the term High resolution larp is brilliant and very well described in Playground words. But I think the Nordic Larp Talk focus a lot on how to use Ars Ordo or Ars Amandi to avoid breaking the high resolution illusion in situations of sex or violence, rather than introducing the term. Can this be specified somehow? Martin Nielsen 25.03.2014.
Maybe just adding that next to the video? --Petterkarlsson (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2014 (CET)
