View source for Nordic Larp Wiki:Redirect/Deletion reasons

{{#switch: {{FULLPAGENAME}}
|Wikipedia:Redirect={{shortcut|WP:R#HARMFUL}}
|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion={{shortcut|WP:RFD#HARMFUL}}
|{{shortcut|WP:RHARMFUL}}
}}
<div id="harmful">{{anchor|HARMFUL}}
<!-- Link directly to this div with: [[Wikipedia:Redirect#harmful]] -->
{{further|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes}}
The major reasons why deletion of redirects is '''harmful''' are:
*a redirect may contain nontrivial edit history;
*if a redirect is reasonably old (or a redirect is created as a result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is quite possible that its deletion will break links in old, historical versions of some other articles—such an event is very difficult to envision and even detect.

Additionally, there could exist (for example) links to the URL "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorneygate" anywhere on the Internet.  If so, then those links might not show up by checking for (clicking on) "[[Special:WhatLinksHere/Attorneygate|WhatLinksHere for Attorneygate]]"—since those links might come from somewhere outside [[Wikipedia]].

Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.
</div>
{{#switch: {{FULLPAGENAME}}
|Wikipedia:Redirect={{shortcut|WP:R#DELETE}}
|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion={{shortcut|WP:RFD#DELETE}}
|{{shortcut|WP:RDELETE|WP:RDEL}}
}}
<div id="delete">{{anchor|DELETE}}

===Reasons for deleting===
<!-- Link directly to this div with: [[Wikipedia:Redirect#delete]] -->
You might want to '''delete''' a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (''but note also the exceptions listed below this list''):
</div>

# {{anchor|D1|d1}}The redirect page makes it ''unreasonably'' difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles", it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wikipedia.
# {{anchor|D2|d2}}The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on [[Adam Smith]], so the redirect should be deleted.
# {{anchor|D3|d3}}The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". ([[WP:CSD#G10|Speedy deletion criterion G10]] may apply.) ''See also: {{section link||Neutrality of redirects}}''.
# {{anchor|D4|d4}}The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. ([[WP:CSD#G11|Speedy deletion criterion G11]] may apply.)
# {{anchor|D5|d5}}The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting [[Apple]] to [[Orange (fruit)|Orange]]. ([[WP:CSD#G1|Speedy deletion criterion G1]] may apply.)
# {{anchor|D6|d6}}It is a [[Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects|cross-namespace redirect]] out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. The major exception to this rule are the [[Wikipedia:pseudo-namespace|pseudo-namespace]] shortcut redirects, which technically are in the main article space. Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MOS:]]" redirects, for example, are an exception to this rule. (Note "WP:" redirects are in the Wikipedia namespace, ''WP:'' being an ''[[Wikipedia:alias|alias]]'' for ''Wikipedia:''.) [[WP:CSD#R2|Speedy deletion criterion R2]] may also apply.
# {{anchor|D7|d7}}If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to itself or to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under [[WP:CSD#G8|speedy deletion criterion G8]], though you should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first.
# {{anchor|D8|d8}}If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, [[WP:RFOREIGN|redirects from a foreign language title]] to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. Implausible typos or misnomers are [[WP:CSD#R3|candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3]], if recently created.
# {{anchor|D9|d9}}If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then it needs to be deleted to make way for move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G6|G6 speedy deletion]]. If not, take the article to [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|Requested moves]]. 
# {{anchor|D10|d10}}If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.
{{#switch: {{FULLPAGENAME}}
|Wikipedia:Redirect={{shortcut|WP:R#KEEP}}
|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion={{shortcut|WP:RFD#KEEP}}
|{{shortcut|WP:RKEEP|WP:RK}}
}}
<div id="keep">{{anchor|KEEP}}

===Reasons for not deleting===
<!-- Link directly to this div with: [[Wikipedia:Redirect#keep]] -->
However, '''avoid deleting''' such redirects if:
</div>
# {{anchor|K1|k1}}They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a merge (see [[Wikipedia:Merge and delete]]). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
# {{anchor|K2|k2}}They would aid [[Meatball:AccidentalLinking|accidental linking]] and make the creation of [[Wikipedia:Proposed mergers|duplicate articles]] less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are ''not'' candidates for deletion ''on those grounds'' because they are of benefit to the browsing user.  Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in the article texts because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links.
# {{anchor|K3|k3}}They aid searches on certain terms. For example, if someone sees the "[[Keystone State]]" mentioned somewhere but does not know what that refers to, then he or she will be able to find out at the [[Pennsylvania]] (target) article. 
# {{anchor|K4|k4}}You risk breaking incoming or internal links by deleting the redirect. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including [[Wikipedia:CamelCase and Wikipedia|CamelCase]] links and old [[Wikipedia:Subpages|subpage]] links, should be left alone in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. See also {{Section link|Wikipedia:Link rot|Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites}}. 
# {{anchor|K5|k5}}Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. <!-- [http://stats.grok.se stats.grok.se] or - website seems to be down.--> The [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/ pageviews tool] can also provide evidence of outside utility.
# {{anchor|K6|k6}}The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals)#Redirect|plural form]] to a [[Wikipedia:Redirect#What do we use redirects for?|singular form]].
# {{anchor|K7|k7}}The redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and deleting the redirect would prevent unregistered  and non-confirmed users from expanding the redirect, and thereby make the encyclopedia harder to edit and reduce the pool of available editors. (Unregistered and non-confirmed users cannot create new pages in the mainspace; they can only edit existing pages, including redirects, which they can expand.) This criterion does not apply to redirects that are indefinitely semi-protected or more highly protected.

===Neutrality of redirects===
{{Shortcut|WP:RNEUTRAL}}
Just as article titles using non-neutral language [[Wikipedia:Article_titles#Non-neutral_but_common_names|are permitted in some circumstances]], so are redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names. Perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is therefore not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but [[WP:V|verifiable]] redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{tlx|R from non-neutral name}}.

Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:

# Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. {{no redirect|Climategate}} → [[Climatic Research Unit email controversy]]).
# Articles created as [[Wikipedia:POV fork|POV fork]]s may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. {{no redirect|Barack Obama Muslim rumor}} → deleted and now redirected to [[Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories]]).
# The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the [[WP:WTA|words to avoid]] guidelines and the general [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view policy]]. For instance the non-neutral expression "{{no redirect|Attorneygate}}" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled [[Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy]]. The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.

The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not [[WP:UNDUE|established term]]s and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under [[#D3|deletion reason #3]]. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream [[WP:SOURCES|reliable sources]], it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|RfD]] is not the place to [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|resolve]] most editorial disputes.<noinclude>


[[Category:Wikipedia deletion]]
</noinclude>