Search results
Create the page "WP:Good article" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
- ...in the [[Wikipedia:Lead section|lead section]] of an already well-sourced article, where that lead is clearly intended to function as a summary of the conten ...e lead section in them is used to summarize the content in the body of the article, which already contains citations for the summarized content. Thus, this te4 KB (538 words) - 01:03, 9 January 2019
- [[WP:NOTCENSORED|Wikipedia is generally not censored]] by the editors but there ...s added. The only censorship by the community of note is the decision to [[WP:Image blacklist|blacklist certain images]] and [[Wikipedia:Viewing deleted3 KB (412 words) - 21:24, 13 January 2019
- * make good faith efforts to find a free version ...ibly copyrighted photographs for aircraft articles under the auspices of [[WP:Air|WikiProject Aircraft]].1 KB (230 words) - 16:58, 1 January 2019
- ...ag" dubious information or analysis which cites references produced by a [[WP:FRINGE|fringe-theory or pseudo-science]] source, so that other editors can ...e reference}} (<code><nowiki><ref> ... </ref></nowiki></code>), within the article's text:5 KB (694 words) - 10:46, 9 January 2019
- * The quotation may have been edited down or taken out of context to [[WP:NOR|imply something the original author/speaker did not actually mean]] ...a good faith attempt to verify the quotation has already been made. If the article has broader sourcing problems, a banner template like {{Tl|Refimprove}} may4 KB (507 words) - 10:46, 9 January 2019
- {{Wikipedia how-to|H:FIND|WP:FIND}} {{nutshell|About finding sources to support a specific Wikipedia article. For finding a source you have already identified, see [[Wikipedia:Find you9 KB (1,310 words) - 18:59, 11 January 2019
- * [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|WP:ANI]] * [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard|WP:BLPN]]11 KB (1,440 words) - 16:30, 5 January 2019
- ...e has been tagged and the tagging editor doesn't ensure that corresponding article talk relative to the tag isn't either already available or added within a s ...edia:Edit warring#Reverting potentially libellous material|this section of WP:3RR]] as well). In the case of text that appears false or doubtful and is n5 KB (714 words) - 10:37, 9 January 2019
- ...'any'' description of a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] that supports any of the article content, even a [[Wikipedia:Link rot|bare URL]]. The format of the citatio ...[[WP:INTEXT|in-text attributions]], consider {{tl|no footnotes}} when the article would be significantly improved by detailed attribution of sources to speci7 KB (976 words) - 10:45, 9 January 2019
- This template will add the article tagged to [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification]] or a month ...out the date parameter, the date parameter will be added soon after by a [[WP:BOT|bot]].",3 KB (391 words) - 01:03, 9 January 2019
- |{{distinguish|text = the article tone dispute tag, [[Template:How-to]]}} ...f [[WP:GOVPS|administration pages]] (not-articles) when appropriate (see [[WP:INFOPAGES]] for details). This usually means pages in the "Wikipedia:" and6 KB (867 words) - 20:46, 13 January 2019
- ...y must be understood in context, using [[WP:COMMONSENSE|some sense]] and [[WP:IAR|discretion]]. Nevertheless there are certain things that [[Wikipedia:Wh .../AIDS denialism]] or [[Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories]], the article should give much more weight to the mainstream view with the fringe view cl10 KB (1,399 words) - 23:55, 10 January 2019
- ...ut insufficient, inline citations to support the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, eve ...e parameters {{tlx|Unreliable source|certain{{=}}y|reason{{=}}{{var|1=your WP:RS-based reason here.}}|date{{=}}{{#time:F Y}}}}10 KB (1,422 words) - 10:29, 9 January 2019
- ...e has been tagged and the tagging editor doesn't ensure that corresponding article talk relative to the tag isn't either already available or added within a s ...tionable origin. '''Do not forget''' to ensure that there is corresponding article talk to explain one's usage of this tag.5 KB (717 words) - 10:30, 9 January 2019
- |Wikipedia:Redirect={{shortcut|WP:R#HARMFUL}} |Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion={{shortcut|WP:RFD#HARMFUL}}11 KB (1,702 words) - 11:07, 11 January 2019
- ...ia article in VisualEditor 2018-02-12.png|alt=|Screenshot showing the same article in [[Wikipedia:VisualEditor|VisualEditor]]. Unlike the wiki markup display, It's considered good [[Wikipedia:Etiquette|practice]] to enter a brief explanation of an edit yo12 KB (1,809 words) - 00:01, 11 January 2019
- ...:Consensus|discussion and consensus among the editors]] at each individual article. ...tatistics" tables in that they (generally) only summarize material from an article<!--taxoboxes are an obvious exception, and so are element infoboxes -->—t10 KB (1,573 words) - 18:59, 11 January 2019
- {{infopage|H:ES|WP:ES}} It is good practice to fill in the edit summary field, or add to it in the case of [[#15 KB (2,421 words) - 11:53, 9 January 2019
- ...sed as a chat room, soapbox, battleground or for general discussion of the article topic. ...in the article's '''[[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]]''' and not in the article itself. You do that by clicking the "talk" tab at the top of the page. Do n9 KB (1,447 words) - 23:56, 10 January 2019
- {{Hatnote|"WP:MINOR" and "WP:ME" redirect here. You might be looking for [[Wikipedia:Child protection]], {{Information page|WP:MINOR|WP:ME}}8 KB (1,285 words) - 13:05, 9 January 2019