Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Games"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I think this category should be renamed to "larps". There is no standard practice for how to refer to individual larps in the English-language Nordic litterature - but most of...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think this category should be renamed to "larps". There is no standard practice for how to refer to individual larps in the English-language Nordic litterature - but most of them are not referred to as "games" ("spill"/"spel") in their native language but rather "lajv"/"laiv"/"rollespill"/"larp", and using the English term "game" with its connotations of competitive play is misleading. If nothing else, calling the category for "larps" should be uncontroversial. --[[User:Efatland|Efatland]] 19:54, 29 April 2012 (CEST) | I think this category should be renamed to "larps". There is no standard practice for how to refer to individual larps in the English-language Nordic litterature - but most of them are not referred to as "games" ("spill"/"spel") in their native language but rather "lajv"/"laiv"/"rollespill"/"larp", and using the English term "game" with its connotations of competitive play is misleading. If nothing else, calling the category for "larps" should be uncontroversial. --[[User:Efatland|Efatland]] 19:54, 29 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That sounds reasonable, I'll go ahead and make the change. :) --[[User:Johannes Axner|Johannes Axner]] 10:00, 30 April 2012 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 09:00, 30 April 2012
I think this category should be renamed to "larps". There is no standard practice for how to refer to individual larps in the English-language Nordic litterature - but most of them are not referred to as "games" ("spill"/"spel") in their native language but rather "lajv"/"laiv"/"rollespill"/"larp", and using the English term "game" with its connotations of competitive play is misleading. If nothing else, calling the category for "larps" should be uncontroversial. --Efatland 19:54, 29 April 2012 (CEST)
That sounds reasonable, I'll go ahead and make the change. :) --Johannes Axner 10:00, 30 April 2012 (CEST)
